Brandon Lucas 2ae2c132e5 docs: add language philosophy document and compiler integration
Write comprehensive PHILOSOPHY.md covering Lux's six core principles
(explicit over implicit, composition over configuration, safety without
ceremony, practical over academic, one right way, tools are the language)
with detailed comparisons against JS/TS, Python, Rust, Go, Java/C#,
Haskell/Elm, and Gleam/Elixir. Includes tooling audit and improvement
suggestions.

Add `lux philosophy` command to the compiler, update help screen with
abbreviated philosophy, and link from README.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.6 <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-02-18 10:19:29 -05:00
2026-02-13 02:57:01 -05:00

Lux

A functional programming language with first-class effects, schema evolution, and behavioral types.

Philosophy

Make the important things visible.

Most languages hide what matters most: what code can do (effects), how data changes over time (schema evolution), and what guarantees functions provide (behavioral properties). Lux makes all three first-class, compiler-checked language features.

Principle What it means
Explicit over implicit Effects in types — see what code does
Composition over configuration No DI frameworks — effects compose naturally
Safety without ceremony Type inference + explicit signatures where they matter
Practical over academic Familiar syntax, ML semantics, no monads
One right way Opinionated formatter, integrated tooling, built-in test framework
Tools are the language lux fmt/lint/check/test/compile — one binary, not seven tools

See docs/PHILOSOPHY.md for the full philosophy with language comparisons and design rationale.

Core Principles

1. Effects Are Explicit and Composable

fn fetchUser(id: UserId): User with {Database, Http} =
  let profile = Http.get("/users/{id}")
  let prefs = Database.query(userPrefsQuery(id))
  User.merge(profile, prefs)

-- Testing: swap real effects for mocks
test "fetchUser returns merged data" =
  run fetchUser(testId) with {
    Database = mockDb({ testId: testPrefs }),
    Http = mockHttp({ "/users/{testId}": testProfile })
  }
  |> Assert.eq(expectedUser)

No hidden side effects. No dependency injection boilerplate. Effects are declared, handlers are swappable, composition just works.

2. Schema Evolution Is Built-In

type User @v1 {
  name: String,
  email: String
}

type User @v2 {
  name: String,
  email: String,
  age: Option<Int>          -- optional field: auto-compatible
}

type User @v3 {
  fullName: String,         -- renamed: requires migration
  email: String,
  age: Option<Int>,

  from @v2 = { fullName: v2.name, ..v2 }
}

The compiler tracks compatibility. Breaking changes are compile errors. Migrations are code, not config.

3. Behavioral Types Are First-Class

fn retry<F, T>(action: F): Result<T, Error>
  where F: fn() -> T with {Fail},
  where F is idempotent                    -- enforced!
=
  match action() {
    Ok(v) => Ok(v),
    Err(_) => action()                     -- safe: we know it's idempotent
  }

fn sort<T: Ord>(list: List<T>): List<T>
  is pure,
  is total,
  where result.len == list.len,
  where result.isSorted

Properties like pure, total, idempotent, commutative are part of the type system. The compiler proves what it can, tests what it can't.

Example

-- Define an effect
effect Logger {
  fn log(level: Level, msg: String): Unit
}

-- Define a versioned type
type Config @v1 {
  host: String,
  port: Int
}

type Config @v2 {
  host: String,
  port: Int,
  timeout: Duration,

  from @v1 = { timeout: Duration.seconds(30), ..v1 }
}

-- A function with explicit effects and properties
fn loadConfig(path: Path): Config @v2 with {FileSystem, Logger}
  is total
=
  Logger.log(Info, "Loading config from {path}")
  let raw = FileSystem.read(path)
  Config.parse(raw)

-- Run with handlers
fn main(): Unit with {Console} =
  let config = run loadConfig("./config.json") with {
    FileSystem = realFs,
    Logger = consoleLogger
  }
  Console.print("Loaded: {config}")

Status

Core Language: Complete

  • Full type system with Hindley-Milner inference
  • Pattern matching with exhaustiveness checking
  • Algebraic data types, generics, string interpolation
  • Effect system with handlers
  • Behavioral types (pure, total, idempotent, deterministic, commutative)
  • Schema evolution with version tracking

Compilation Targets:

  • Interpreter (full-featured)
  • C backend (functions, closures, pattern matching, lists, reference counting)
  • JavaScript backend (full language, browser & Node.js, DOM, TEA runtime)

Tooling:

  • REPL with history
  • LSP server (diagnostics, hover, completions, go-to-definition)
  • Formatter (lux fmt)
  • Package manager (lux pkg)
  • Watch mode / hot reload

Standard Library:

  • String, List, Option, Result, Math, JSON modules
  • Console, File, Http, Random, Time, Process effects
  • SQL effect (SQLite with transactions)
  • PostgreSQL effect (connection pooling ready)
  • DOM effect (40+ browser operations)

See:

Design Goals

Goal Approach
Correctness by default Effects, schemas, and behaviors are compiler-checked
Incremental adoption Start simple, add properties/versions as needed
Zero-cost abstractions Effect handlers inline, versions compile away
Practical, not academic Familiar syntax, clear errors, gradual verification

Non-Goals

  • Not a systems language (no manual memory management)
  • Not a scripting language (static types required)
  • Not a proof assistant (verification is practical, not total)

Building

# Build
nix build

# Run the REPL
nix run

# Enter development shell
nix develop

# Run tests
nix develop --command cargo test

With Cargo

Requires Rust 1.70+:

cargo build --release
./target/release/lux           # REPL
./target/release/lux file.lux  # Run a file
cargo test                     # Tests

Examples

See the examples/ directory:

  • hello.lux — Hello World with effects
  • factorial.lux — Recursive functions
  • effects.lux — Custom effects and handlers
  • datatypes.lux — ADTs and pattern matching
  • functional.lux — Higher-order functions and pipes

Quick REPL Session

$ cargo run
Lux v0.1.0
Type :help for help, :quit to exit

lux> let x = 42
lux> x * 2
84
lux> fn double(n: Int): Int = n * 2
lux> double(21)
42
lux> [1, 2, 3] |> List.reverse
[3, 2, 1]
lux> List.map([1, 2, 3], double)
[2, 4, 6]
lux> String.split("a,b,c", ",")
["a", "b", "c"]
lux> Some(42) |> Option.map(double)
Some(84)
lux> :quit

Contributing

This project is in early design. Contributions welcome in:

  • Language design discussions (open an issue)
  • Syntax bikeshedding
  • Semantic formalization
  • Compiler implementation (once design stabilizes)

License

MIT

Description
No description provided
Readme 15 MiB
Lux v0.1.13 Latest
2026-02-20 20:47:01 -05:00
Languages
Rust 89.2%
HTML 4.5%
JavaScript 1.4%
Shell 1.3%
CSS 1.1%
Other 2.5%