# Lux: Vision and Roadmap

## The Problems Lux Solves

### 1. The "What Can This Code Do?" Problem

In most languages, you can't tell from a function signature what it might do:

```typescript
// TypeScript - what does this do? No idea without reading the code.
function processOrder(order: Order): Receipt { ... }
```

Could it hit a database? Send emails? Log? Throw? You don't know until you read every line (and every function it calls).

**Lux solution:**

```lux
fn processOrder(order: Order): Receipt with {Database, Email, Logger, Fail}
```

The signature *is* the documentation. Code review becomes "should this function really send emails?" Effects are compile-time checked.

### 2. The Testing Problem

Testing side-effecting code requires mocking frameworks, dependency injection containers, and boilerplate:

```typescript
// TypeScript - need DI framework, mock libraries, setup/teardown
const mockDb = jest.mock('./database');
const mockEmail = jest.mock('./email');
// ... 50 lines of setup
```

**Lux solution:**

```lux
// Production
run processOrder(order) with {
    Database = postgres(connString),
    Email = sendgrid(apiKey),
    Logger = cloudWatch
}

// Test - same code, different handlers
run processOrder(order) with {
    Database = inMemoryDb(testData),
    Email = collectEmails(sentList),  // captures instead of sends
    Logger = nullLogger
}
```

No mocking library. No DI framework. Just swap handlers.

### 3. The Schema Evolution Problem (Planned)

Types change. Data persists. Every production system eventually faces:
- "I renamed this field, now deserialization breaks"
- "I added a required field, old data can't load"
- "I need to migrate 10M rows and pray"

**Lux solution:**

```lux
type User @v1 { name: String, email: String }

type User @v2 {
    name: String,
    email: String,
    createdAt: Timestamp,
    from @v1 = { createdAt: Timestamp.epoch(), ..v1 }  // migration
}

type User @v3 {
    fullName: String,  // renamed
    email: String,
    createdAt: Timestamp,
    from @v2 = { fullName: v2.name, ..v2 }
}

// Compiler knows: v1 → v2 is auto-compatible, v2 → v3 needs migration
// Serialization handles any version automatically
```

### 4. The "Is This Safe?" Problem (Planned)

Critical properties are documented in comments and hoped for:

```typescript
// IMPORTANT: This function must be idempotent for retry logic!
function chargeCard(payment: Payment): Result { ... }
```

**Lux solution:**

```lux
fn chargeCard(payment: Payment): Result
    is idempotent  // Compiler enforces or generates property tests
```

```lux
fn retry<F>(action: F, times: Int): Result
    where F is idempotent  // Won't compile if you pass non-idempotent function
```

---

## What's Built vs. What's Needed

### Currently Working (Phase 1: Core Language)

| Feature | Status | Notes |
|---------|--------|-------|
| Lexer/Parser | Done | Full syntax support |
| Type Inference | Done | Hindley-Milner |
| Functions/Closures | Done | First-class functions |
| Pattern Matching | Done | Destructuring, guards |
| Records/Tuples/Lists | Done | Basic data structures |
| Effect Declarations | Done | `effect Name { ... }` |
| Effect Operations | Done | `Effect.operation()` |
| Effect Handlers | Done | `handler name: Effect { ... }` |
| Run with Handlers | Done | `run expr with { ... }` |
| Built-in Console/Fail | Done | Basic IO |
| REPL | Done | Interactive development |
| Type Checking | Done | With effect tracking |

### Completed (Phase 2: Practical)

| Feature | Status | Notes |
|---------|--------|-------|
| **Module System** | ✅ Done | Imports, exports, aliases, selective imports |
| **Standard Library** | ✅ Done | List, String, Option, Result, Math, Json modules |
| **File Effect** | ✅ Done | read, write, exists, delete, listDir, mkdir |
| **HTTP Client Effect** | ✅ Done | get, post, put, delete |
| **HTTP Server Effect** | ✅ Done | listen, accept, respond, stop |
| **Process Effect** | ✅ Done | exec, env, args, cwd, exit |
| **Random/Time Effects** | ✅ Done | int, float, bool, now, sleep |
| **JIT Compiler** | ✅ Partial | Numeric code ~160x faster, strings/ADTs pending |
| **Error Messages** | ✅ Partial | Context lines shown, suggestions improving |

### In Progress (Phase 3: Differentiation)

| Feature | Status | Notes |
|---------|--------|-------|
| **Schema Evolution** | ⚠️ Partial | Parsing done, type integration pending |
| **Behavioral Types** | ⚠️ Partial | Parsing done, verification pending |
| **LSP Server** | ✅ Done | Diagnostics, hover, completions working |
| **Package Manager** | ⚠️ Partial | Manifest parsing exists |
| **Effect Tracing** | Planned | Elm-like debugging |

---

## Elm-Style Debugging for Effects

Elm's debugging is famous because:
1. **Time-travel**: See app state at any point
2. **No runtime crashes**: Everything is Result/Maybe
3. **Amazing error messages**: Context, suggestions, examples

Lux can go further because effects are explicit:

### Effect Tracing

Every effect operation can be automatically logged:

```lux
// With tracing enabled:
run processOrder(order) with {
    Database = traced(postgres),  // Logs all queries
    Email = traced(sendgrid),     // Logs all sends
    Logger = traced(cloudWatch)   // Meta-logging!
}

// Output:
// [00:00:01] Database.query("SELECT * FROM users WHERE id = 42")
// [00:00:02] Database.query("SELECT * FROM inventory WHERE sku = 'ABC'")
// [00:00:03] Email.send(to: "customer@example.com", subject: "Order Confirmed")
// [00:00:03] Logger.log(level: "info", msg: "Order 123 processed")
```

### Effect Replay

Since all effects are captured, we can replay:

```lux
// Record effects during production
let recording = record(processOrder(order)) with { Database = postgres, ... }

// Replay in development with exact same effect responses
replay(recording) with { Database = mockFromRecording(recording) }
```

### State Snapshots

Since state changes only happen through effects:

```lux
// Snapshot state before/after each effect
run debugSession(app) with {
    State = snapshotted(initialState),  // Captures every state change
    Console = traced(stdout)
}

// Later: inspect state at any point, step forward/backward
```

### Error Messages (To Build)

Current:
```
Type error at 15-45: Cannot unify Int with String
```

Goal (Elm-style):
```
── TYPE MISMATCH ─────────────────────────────────────── src/order.lux

The `calculateTotal` function expects an `Int` but got a `String`:

15│   let total = calculateTotal(order.quantity)
                                 ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

`order.quantity` is a `String` but `calculateTotal` needs an `Int`.

Hint: Maybe you need to parse the string?

    let qty = Int.parse(order.quantity)?
    let total = calculateTotal(qty)
```

---

## Development Effort Summary

**To be minimally useful for real projects:**
- Module system + standard library + better errors
- **Estimate: 6-8 weeks of focused work**

**To deliver the full vision (effects + schemas + behavioral types):**
- All of the above + schema evolution + behavioral types + compilation
- **Estimate: 4-6 months of focused work**

**To have Elm-quality experience:**
- All of the above + debugging tools + LSP + package manager
- **Estimate: 8-12 months of focused work**

---

## Immediate Next Steps

1. ~~**Standard Library**~~ - Done! List, String, Option, Result operations
2. ~~**Module System**~~ - Done! Imports, exports, aliases, selective imports
3. **File Effect** - `FileSystem.read`, `FileSystem.write`
4. **Error Message Overhaul** - Source snippets, suggestions, colors
5. **JavaScript Backend** - Compile to runnable JS

These would make Lux usable for small real projects.